+
+ {/* Print footer - only visible when printing */}
+
+
{translations.printFooter}
+
+
+
+ >
+ );
+};
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/docs/framework/how-to-use-sprint-playbook-template-improved.md b/docs/framework/how-to-use-sprint-playbook-template-improved.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..076d669
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/framework/how-to-use-sprint-playbook-template-improved.md
@@ -0,0 +1,363 @@
+# π How to Use the Sprint Playbook Template (Improved)
+
+*(Enhanced Guide for AI Agent)*
+
+---
+
+## π― Purpose
+
+This enhanced guide explains how to generate a **Sprint Playbook** from the **Improved Sprint Playbook Template**.
+The Playbook serves as the **single source of truth** for sprint planning, execution, and tracking.
+
+**AI Agent Role:**
+1. Analyze user requirements with enhanced clarity checking
+2. Perform comprehensive project state assessment
+3. Create granular, testable user stories with dependencies
+4. Populate playbook with actionable technical guidance
+5. Establish quality gates and risk mitigation strategies
+6. Enable iterative refinement based on user feedback
+
+---
+
+## π Enhanced Step-by-Step Instructions
+
+### 1. Analyze User Input (Enhanced)
+
+**MANDATORY ANALYSIS PROCESS:**
+1. **Extract Primary Goal**: What is the main business/technical objective?
+2. **Identify Scope Boundaries**: What is explicitly included/excluded?
+3. **Parse Technical Constraints**: Frameworks, patterns, performance requirements
+4. **Assess Complexity Level**: Simple (1-2 days), Medium (3-5 days), Complex (1+ weeks)
+5. **Identify Integration Points**: Other systems, APIs, data sources
+6. **Check for Non-Functional Requirements**: Security, performance, accessibility
+
+**Enhanced Clarity Checking:**
+If ANY of these conditions are met, STOP and ask for clarification:
+
+- **Vague Success Criteria**: "improve", "enhance", "make better" without metrics
+- **Missing Technical Details**: Which specific framework version, API endpoints, data formats
+- **Unclear User Experience**: No mention of who uses the feature or how
+- **Ambiguous Scope**: Could be interpreted as either small change or major feature
+- **Conflicting Requirements**: Performance vs. feature richness, security vs. usability
+- **Missing Dependencies**: References to undefined components, services, or data
+
+**Structured Clarification Process:**
+1. **Categorize Unknowns**: Technical, Business, User Experience, Integration
+2. **Ask Specific Questions**: Provide 2-3 concrete options when possible
+3. **Request Examples**: "Can you show me a similar feature you like?"
+4. **Validate Understanding**: Repeat back interpretation for confirmation
+
+---
+
+### 2. Assess Current State (Comprehensive)
+
+**MANDATORY DISCOVERY STEPS:**
+1. **Read Core Application Files**:
+ - Entry points: `main.py`, `index.js`, `app.py`, `src/main.ts`
+ - Configuration: `.env`, `config.*`, `settings.py`, `next.config.js`
+ - Package management: `package.json`, `requirements.txt`, `Cargo.toml`, `pom.xml`
+
+2. **Analyze Architecture**:
+ - Directory structure and organization patterns
+ - Module boundaries and dependency flows
+ - Data models and database schemas
+ - API endpoints and routing patterns
+
+3. **Review Testing Infrastructure**:
+ - Test frameworks and utilities available
+ - Current test coverage and patterns
+ - CI/CD pipeline configuration
+ - Quality gates and automation
+
+4. **Assess Documentation**:
+ - README completeness and accuracy
+ - API documentation status
+ - Code comments and inline docs
+ - User guides or tutorials
+
+5. **Identify Technical Debt**:
+ - Known issues or TODOs
+ - Deprecated dependencies
+ - Performance bottlenecks
+ - Security vulnerabilities
+
+**Output Requirements:**
+- **Factual Assessment**: No speculation, only observable facts
+- **Relevance Filtering**: Focus on sprint-related components only
+- **Version Specificity**: Include exact version numbers for all dependencies
+- **Gap Identification**: Clearly note missing pieces needed for sprint success
+
+---
+
+### 3. Sprint ID Selection (Enhanced)
+
+**EXACT ALGORITHM:**
+1. **Check Directory Structure**:
+ ```bash
+ if docs/sprints/ exists:
+ scan for files matching "sprint-\d\d-*.md"
+ else:
+ create directory and use "01"
+ ```
+
+2. **Extract and Validate IDs**:
+ - Use regex: `sprint-(\d\d)-.*\.md`
+ - Validate two-digit format with zero padding
+ - Sort numerically (not lexicographically)
+
+3. **Calculate Next ID**:
+ - Find maximum existing ID
+ - Increment by 1
+ - Ensure zero-padding (sprintf "%02d" format)
+
+4. **Conflict Resolution**:
+ - If gaps exist (e.g., 01, 03, 05), use next in sequence (04)
+ - If no pattern found, default to "01"
+ - Never reuse IDs even if sprint was cancelled
+
+**Validation Checkpoint**: Double-check calculated ID against filesystem before proceeding.
+
+---
+
+### 4. Define Desired State (Enhanced)
+
+**MANDATORY SECTIONS WITH EXAMPLES:**
+
+1. **New Features** (Specific):
+ ```
+ β Bad: "User authentication system"
+ β Good: "JWT-based login with Google OAuth integration, session management, and role-based access control"
+ ```
+
+2. **Modified Features** (Before/After):
+ ```
+ β Bad: "Improve dashboard performance"
+ β Good: "Dashboard load time: 3.2s β <1.5s by implementing virtual scrolling and data pagination"
+ ```
+
+3. **Expected Behavior Changes** (User-Visible):
+ ```
+ β Bad: "Better error handling"
+ β Good: "Invalid form inputs show inline validation messages instead of generic alerts"
+ ```
+
+4. **External Dependencies** (Version-Specific):
+ ```
+ β Bad: "Add React components"
+ β Good: "Add @headlessui/react ^1.7.0 for accessible dropdown components"
+ ```
+
+**Quality Checklist**:
+- Each item is independently verifiable
+- Success criteria are measurable
+- Implementation approach is technically feasible
+- Dependencies are explicitly listed with versions
+
+---
+
+### 5. Break Down Into User Stories (Enhanced)
+
+**STORY GRANULARITY RULES:**
+- **Maximum Implementation Time**: 4-6 hours of focused work
+- **Independent Testability**: Each story can be tested in isolation
+- **Single Responsibility**: One clear functional outcome per story
+- **Atomic Commits**: Typically 1-2 commits per story maximum
+
+**ENHANCED STORY COMPONENTS:**
+
+1. **Story ID**: Sequential numbering with dependency tracking
+2. **Title**: Action-oriented, 2-4 words (e.g., "Add Login Button", "Implement JWT Validation")
+3. **Description**: Includes context, acceptance criteria preview, technical approach
+4. **Acceptance Criteria**: 3-5 specific, testable conditions using Given/When/Then format
+5. **Definition of Done**: Includes "user testing completed" for all user-facing changes
+6. **Dependencies**: References to other stories that must complete first
+7. **Estimated Time**: Realistic hour estimate for planning
+8. **Risk Level**: Low/Medium/High based on technical complexity
+
+**ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FORMAT:**
+```
+Given [initial state]
+When [user action or system trigger]
+Then [expected outcome]
+And [additional verifications]
+```
+
+**Example User Story:**
+```
+| US-3 | Implement JWT Validation | Create middleware to validate JWT tokens on protected routes | Given a request to protected endpoint, When JWT is missing/invalid/expired, Then return 401 with specific error message, And log security event | Middleware implemented, unit tests added, error handling tested, security logging verified, **user testing completed** | AI-Agent | π² todo | 3 hours | US-1, US-2 |
+```
+
+**DEPENDENCY MANAGEMENT:**
+- Use topological sorting for story order
+- Identify critical path and potential parallelization
+- Plan for dependency failures or delays
+- Consider story splitting to reduce dependencies
+
+---
+
+### 6. Add Technical Instructions (Comprehensive)
+
+**REQUIRED SECTIONS WITH DEPTH:**
+
+1. **Code Snippets/Patterns** (Executable Examples):
+ ```typescript
+ // Actual working example following project conventions
+ export const authenticatedRoute = withAuth(async (req: AuthRequest, res: Response) => {
+ const { userId } = req.user; // from JWT middleware
+ const data = await fetchUserData(userId);
+ return res.json({ success: true, data });
+ });
+ ```
+
+2. **Architecture Guidelines** (Specific Patterns):
+ - **Layer Separation**: "Controllers in `/api/`, business logic in `/services/`, data access in `/repositories/`"
+ - **Error Handling**: "Use Result pattern, never throw in async functions"
+ - **State Management**: "Use Zustand for client state, React Query for server state"
+
+3. **Coding Style Conventions** (Tool-Specific):
+ - **Naming**: "Components: PascalCase, functions: camelCase, constants: SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE"
+ - **Files**: "Components end with `.tsx`, utilities with `.ts`, tests with `.test.ts`"
+ - **Imports**: "Absolute imports with `@/` alias, group by type (libraries, internal, relative)"
+
+4. **Testing Strategy** (Framework-Specific):
+ - **Unit Tests**: "Jest + Testing Library, minimum 80% coverage for business logic"
+ - **Integration**: "Supertest for API endpoints, test database with cleanup"
+ - **Manual Testing**: "User validates UI/UX after each user-facing story completion"
+
+5. **Quality Gates** (Automated Checks):
+ - **Build**: "`npm run build` must pass without errors"
+ - **Lint**: "`npm run lint:check` must pass with zero warnings"
+ - **Format**: "`npm run prettier:check` must pass"
+ - **Tests**: "`npm test` must pass with coverage thresholds met"
+
+---
+
+### 7. Capture Risks and Dependencies (Proactive)
+
+**ENHANCED RISK ASSESSMENT:**
+
+1. **Technical Risks** (with Mitigation):
+ ```
+ Risk: "JWT library might not support RS256 algorithm"
+ Impact: High (blocks authentication)
+ Probability: Low
+ Mitigation: "Research jsonwebtoken vs. jose libraries in discovery phase"
+ ```
+
+2. **Integration Risks** (with Fallbacks):
+ ```
+ Risk: "Google OAuth API rate limits during development"
+ Impact: Medium (slows testing)
+ Probability: Medium
+ Fallback: "Mock OAuth responses for local development"
+ ```
+
+3. **Timeline Risks** (with Buffers):
+ ```
+ Risk: "Database migration complexity unknown"
+ Impact: High (affects multiple stories)
+ Buffer: "Add 20% time buffer, prepare manual migration scripts"
+ ```
+
+**DEPENDENCY TRACKING:**
+- **Internal Dependencies**: Other modules, shared utilities, database changes
+- **External Dependencies**: Third-party APIs, service availability, credentials
+- **Human Dependencies**: Design assets, content, domain expertise
+- **Infrastructure Dependencies**: Deployment access, environment variables, certificates
+
+---
+
+### 8. Enhanced Quality Gates
+
+**CODE QUALITY GATES:**
+- [ ] **Static Analysis**: ESLint, SonarQube, or equivalent passes
+- [ ] **Security Scan**: No high/critical vulnerabilities in dependencies
+- [ ] **Performance**: No significant regression in key metrics
+- [ ] **Accessibility**: WCAG compliance for user-facing changes
+
+**TESTING QUALITY GATES:**
+- [ ] **Coverage Threshold**: Minimum X% line coverage maintained
+- [ ] **Test Quality**: No skipped tests, meaningful assertions
+- [ ] **Edge Cases**: Error conditions and boundary values tested
+- [ ] **User Acceptance**: Manual testing completed and approved
+
+**DOCUMENTATION QUALITY GATES:**
+- [ ] **API Changes**: OpenAPI spec updated for backend changes
+- [ ] **User Impact**: User-facing changes documented in appropriate format
+- [ ] **Technical Decisions**: ADRs (Architecture Decision Records) updated for significant changes
+- [ ] **Runbook Updates**: Deployment or operational procedures updated
+
+---
+
+### 9. Advanced Definition of Done (DoD)
+
+**AI-RESPONSIBLE ITEMS** (Comprehensive):
+* [ ] All user stories meet individual DoD criteria
+* [ ] All quality gates passed (code, testing, documentation)
+* [ ] Code compiles and passes all automated tests
+* [ ] Security review completed (dependency scan, code analysis)
+* [ ] Performance benchmarks meet requirements
+* [ ] Accessibility standards met (if applicable)
+* [ ] Code is committed with conventional commit messages
+* [ ] Branch pushed with all commits and proper history
+* [ ] Documentation updated and reviewed
+* [ ] Sprint status updated to `β completed`
+* [ ] Technical debt documented for future sprints
+* [ ] Lessons learned captured in playbook
+
+**USER-ONLY ITEMS** (Clear Boundaries):
+* [ ] User acceptance testing completed successfully
+* [ ] Cross-browser/device compatibility verified
+* [ ] Production deployment completed and verified
+* [ ] External system integrations tested end-to-end
+* [ ] Performance validated in production environment
+* [ ] Stakeholder sign-off received
+* [ ] User training/documentation reviewed (if applicable)
+* [ ] Monitoring and alerting configured (if applicable)
+
+---
+
+## β οΈ Enhanced Guardrails
+
+**SCOPE CREEP PREVENTION:**
+- Document any "nice-to-have" features discovered during implementation
+- Create follow-up sprint candidates for scope additions
+- Maintain strict focus on original sprint goal
+- Get explicit approval for any requirement changes
+
+**TECHNICAL DEBT MANAGEMENT:**
+- Document shortcuts taken with rationale
+- Estimate effort to address debt properly
+- Prioritize debt that affects sprint success
+- Plan debt paydown in future sprints
+
+**COMMUNICATION PROTOCOLS:**
+- **Daily Updates**: Progress, blockers, timeline risks
+- **Weekly Reviews**: Demo working features, gather feedback
+- **Blocker Escalation**: Immediate notification with context and options
+- **Scope Questions**: Present options with pros/cons, request decision
+
+---
+
+## β Enhanced Output Requirements
+
+**MANDATORY CHECKLIST** - Sprint Playbook must have:
+
+1. β **Validated Sprint ID** - Following algorithmic ID selection
+2. β **Complete metadata** - All fields filled with realistic estimates
+3. β **Comprehensive state analysis** - Based on thorough code examination
+4. β **Measurable desired state** - Specific success criteria, not vague goals
+5. β **Granular user stories** - 4-6 hour implementation chunks with dependencies
+6. β **Executable acceptance criteria** - Given/When/Then format where appropriate
+7. β **Comprehensive DoD items** - Including user testing checkpoints
+8. β **Detailed technical guidance** - Working code examples and specific tools
+9. β **Proactive risk management** - Risks with mitigation strategies
+10. β **Quality gates defined** - Automated and manual verification steps
+11. β **Clear responsibility boundaries** - AI vs User tasks explicitly separated
+12. β **Communication protocols** - How and when to interact during sprint
+
+**FINAL VALIDATION**: The completed playbook should enable a different AI agent to execute the sprint successfully with minimal additional clarification.
+
+**ITERATIVE IMPROVEMENT**: After each sprint, capture lessons learned and refine the process for better efficiency and quality in future sprints.
+
+---
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/docs/framework/how-to-use-sprint-playbook-template.md b/docs/framework/how-to-use-sprint-playbook-template.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5fef372
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/framework/how-to-use-sprint-playbook-template.md
@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
+# π How to Use the Sprint Playbook Template
+
+*(Guide for AI Agent)*
+
+---
+
+## π― Purpose
+
+This guide explains how to generate a **Sprint Playbook** from the **Sprint Playbook Template**.
+The Playbook is the **authoritative plan and tracking file** for the Sprint.
+Your role as AI agent is to:
+
+1. Interpret the userβs Sprint goal.
+2. Analyze the current project state.
+3. Split work into clear user stories.
+4. Populate the Playbook with concise, actionable details.
+5. Ensure the Playbook defines a **minimal implementation** β no extra features beyond scope.
+
+---
+
+## π Step-by-Step Instructions
+
+### 1. Analyze User Input
+
+* Read the userβs description of what should be achieved in the Sprint.
+* Extract the **general goal** (e.g., βadd authentication,β βimprove reporting,β βfix performance issuesβ).
+* Note any explicit **constraints** (frameworks, coding styles, patterns).
+
+**If gaps, ambiguities, or contradictions are detected:**
+
+**MANDATORY PROCESS:**
+1. **STOP playbook creation immediately**
+2. **Ask user for specific clarification** with concrete questions:
+ * *"Do you want authentication for all users or just admins?"*
+ * *"Should performance improvements target backend response times or frontend rendering?"*
+ * *"You mentioned using Django, but the codebase uses Flask β should we migrate or stick with Flask?"*
+3. **Wait for user response** - do not proceed with assumptions
+4. **Repeat clarification cycle** until goal is completely unambiguous
+5. **Only then proceed** to create the playbook
+
+**CRITICAL RULE**: Never proceed with unclear requirements - this will cause blocking during implementation.
+
+---
+
+### 2. Assess Current State
+
+**MANDATORY STEPS:**
+1. Read project entry points (e.g., `main.py`, `index.js`, `app.py`)
+2. Identify and read core business logic modules
+3. Read configuration files (`.env`, `config.*`, etc.)
+4. Read dependency files (`package.json`, `requirements.txt`, `Cargo.toml`, etc.)
+5. List current main features available
+6. List known limitations or issues
+7. List relevant file paths
+8. Document runtime versions, frameworks, and libraries
+
+**Output Requirements:**
+* Keep descriptions factual and concise (2-3 sentences per item)
+* Focus only on functionality relevant to the sprint goal
+* Do not speculate about future capabilities
+
+---
+
+### 3. Sprint ID Selection (Mandatory Process)
+
+**EXACT STEPS TO FOLLOW:**
+1. **Check if `docs/sprints/` directory exists**
+ - If directory doesn't exist: set **Sprint ID = `01`**
+ - If directory exists: proceed to step 2
+
+2. **List existing sprint files**
+ - Search for files matching pattern: `docs/sprints/sprint-??-*.md`
+ - Extract only the two-digit numbers (ignore everything else)
+ - Example: `sprint-03-auth.md` β extract `03`
+
+3. **Calculate new ID**
+ - If no matching files found: set **Sprint ID = `01`**
+ - If files found: find maximum ID number and increment by 1
+ - Preserve zero-padding (e.g., `03` β `04`, `09` β `10`)
+
+**CRITICAL RULES:**
+- NEVER use IDs from example documents - examples are for formatting only
+- NEVER guess or assume sprint IDs
+- ALWAYS preserve two-digit zero-padding format
+- This is the single source of truth for Sprint ID assignment
+
+---
+
+### 4. Define Desired State
+
+**MANDATORY SECTIONS:**
+1. **New Features** - List exactly what new functionality will be added
+2. **Modified Features** - List existing features that will be changed
+3. **Expected Behavior Changes** - Describe how user/system behavior will differ
+4. **External Dependencies/Integrations** - List new libraries, APIs, or services needed
+
+**Requirements:**
+* Each item must be specific and measurable
+* Avoid vague terms like "improve" or "enhance" - be precise
+* Only include changes directly needed for the sprint goal
+
+---
+
+### 5. Break Down Into User Stories
+
+**STORY CREATION RULES:**
+1. Each story must be implementable independently
+2. Story should require 1-2 commits maximum
+3. Story must have measurable acceptance criteria
+4. Story must include specific DoD items
+
+**MANDATORY STORY COMPONENTS:**
+* **Story ID**: Sequential numbering (`US-1`, `US-2`, `US-3`...)
+* **Title**: 2-4 word description of the functionality
+* **Description**: Clear explanation of what needs to be implemented
+* **Acceptance Criteria**: Specific, testable conditions that must be met
+* **Definition of Done**: Concrete checklist (implemented, tested, docs updated, lint clean)
+* **Assignee**: Always `AI-Agent` for AI-implemented sprints
+* **Status**: Always starts as `π² todo`
+
+**STATUS PROGRESSION (AI must follow exactly):**
+* `π² todo` β `π§ in progress` β `β done`
+* If blocked: any status β `π« blocked` (requires user intervention)
+* **CRITICAL**: If ANY story becomes `π« blocked`, STOP all sprint work immediately
+
+---
+
+### 6. Add Technical Instructions
+
+**REQUIRED SECTIONS:**
+* **Code Snippets/Patterns**: Include specific code examples that show structure
+* **Architecture Guidelines**: Define module boundaries, layering, design patterns
+* **Coding Style Conventions**: Specify naming rules, formatting, linting requirements
+* **Testing Strategy**: Define what testing is required (unit/integration, framework, coverage)
+
+**GUIDELINES:**
+* Provide concrete examples, not abstract descriptions
+* If multiple approaches exist, specify exactly which one to use
+* Include specific commands for building, testing, and linting
+* Reference existing project conventions where possible
+
+---
+
+### 7. Capture Risks and Dependencies
+
+* List potential **risks** (technical, integration, scope-related).
+* List **dependencies** (modules, libraries, APIs, data sources).
+
+---
+
+### 8. Apply Definition of Done (DoD)
+
+**USER STORY DoD (for each story):**
+* Must include specific, measurable items like:
+ * "Endpoint implemented and returns correct status codes"
+ * "Unit tests added with 80%+ coverage"
+ * "Documentation updated in README"
+ * "Code passes linter without errors"
+
+**SPRINT DoD STRUCTURE (mandatory separation):**
+
+**AI-Responsible Items** (AI MUST tick these when completed):
+* [ ] All user stories meet their individual Definition of Done
+* [ ] Code compiles and passes automated tests
+* [ ] Code is committed and pushed on branch `[feature/sprint-]`
+* [ ] Documentation is updated
+* [ ] Sprint status updated to `β done`
+
+**User-Only Items** (AI MUST NEVER tick these):
+* [ ] Branch is merged into main
+* [ ] Production deployment completed (if applicable)
+* [ ] External system integrations verified (if applicable)
+
+**CRITICAL RULE**: AI agents must NEVER tick user-only DoD items under any circumstances.
+
+---
+
+---
+
+## β οΈ Guardrail Against Overfitting
+
+If you are provided with **example Sprint Playbooks**:
+
+* Use them **only to understand formatting and structure**.
+* Do **not** copy their technologies, libraries, or domain-specific details unless explicitly relevant.
+* Always prioritize:
+
+ 1. **Sprint Playbook Template**
+ 2. **User instructions**
+ 3. **Project state analysis**
+
+---
+
+## β Output Requirements
+
+**MANDATORY CHECKLIST** - Sprint Playbook must have:
+
+1. β **Correct Sprint ID** - Follow Sprint ID selection rule (increment from existing)
+2. β **Complete metadata** - All fields in Sprint Metadata section filled
+3. β **Current state analysis** - Based on actual project file examination
+4. β **Specific desired state** - Measurable outcomes, not vague goals
+5. β **Independent user stories** - Each story can be implemented separately
+6. β **Testable acceptance criteria** - Each story has specific pass/fail conditions
+7. β **Concrete DoD items** - Specific, actionable checklist items
+8. β **Technical guidance** - Actual code snippets and specific instructions
+9. β **Risk identification** - Potential blockers and dependencies listed
+10. β **Proper DoD separation** - AI vs User responsibilities clearly marked
+
+**VALIDATION**: Before finalizing, verify that another AI agent could execute the sprint based solely on the playbook content without additional clarification.
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/docs/framework/sprint-implementation-guidelines-improved.md b/docs/framework/sprint-implementation-guidelines-improved.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..40098d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/framework/sprint-implementation-guidelines-improved.md
@@ -0,0 +1,524 @@
+# π Sprint Implementation Guidelines (Improved)
+
+These enhanced guidelines define how the AI agent must implement a Sprint based on the approved **Sprint Playbook**.
+They ensure consistent execution, comprehensive testing, proactive risk management, and optimal user collaboration.
+
+---
+
+## 0. Key Definitions (Enhanced)
+
+**Logical Unit of Work (LUW)**: A single, cohesive code change that:
+- Implements one specific functionality or fixes one specific issue
+- Can be described in 1-2 sentences with clear before/after behavior
+- Passes all relevant tests and quality gates
+- Can be committed independently without breaking the system
+- Takes 30-90 minutes of focused implementation time
+
+**Testing Checkpoint**: A mandatory pause where AI provides specific test instructions to user:
+- Clear step-by-step test procedures
+- Expected behavior descriptions
+- Pass/fail criteria
+- What to look for (visual, functional, performance)
+- How to report issues or failures
+
+**Blocked Status (`π« blocked`)**: A user story cannot proceed due to:
+- Missing external dependencies that cannot be mocked/simulated
+- Conflicting requirements discovered during implementation
+- Failed tests that require domain knowledge to resolve
+- Technical limitations requiring architecture decisions
+- User input needed for UX/business logic decisions
+
+**Iterative Refinement**: Process of making improvements based on user testing:
+- User reports specific issues or improvement requests
+- AI analyzes feedback and proposes solutions
+- Implementation of fixes follows same LUW/commit pattern
+- Re-testing until user confirms satisfaction
+
+---
+
+## 1. Enhanced Git & Version Control Rules
+
+### 1.1 Commit Granularity (Refined)
+
+**MANDATORY COMMIT PATTERNS:**
+* **Feature Implementation**: One LUW per commit
+* **Test Addition**: Included in same commit as feature (not separate)
+* **Documentation Updates**: Included in same commit as related code changes
+* **Bug Fixes**: One fix per commit with clear reproduction steps in message
+* **Refactoring**: Separate commits, no functional changes mixed in
+
+**COMMIT QUALITY CRITERIA:**
+* Build passes after each commit
+* Tests pass after each commit
+* No temporary/debug code included
+* All related files updated (tests, docs, types)
+
+### 1.2 Commit Message Style (Enhanced)
+
+**STRICT FORMAT:**
+```
+(scope):
+
+
+
+